window.MathJax = { options: { enableMenu: false, // Désactiver le menu contextuel (peut réduire l'utilisation d'eval) processHtmlClass: 'tex2jax_process' }, startup: { pageReady() { // Logging optionnel des erreurs console.log('MathJax 4.1 chargé avec succès'); return MathJax.startup.defaultPageReady(); } } };

Pasa Analytics | Bayesian Analysis - Advanced Statistical Inference

Bayesian Analysis

PA
∇⋅E = ρ/ε₀
E = mc²
S = k log W
F = ma

1. Mechanical Resistance [january 2024]

Methodology

This study was conducted in R using rstan and brms packages for Bayesian inference.

Bayesian Philosophy

Unlike classical frequentist methods that provide point estimates, Bayesian analysis produces complete probability distributions for parameters of interest.

This approach offers several advantages:

  • Statistical honesty : Complete uncertainty presentation
  • Natural inference : Direct calculation of posterior probabilities
  • Prior information integration : Incorporation of domain expertise
  • Probabilistic predictions : Credibility intervals for predictions

Study Problem

The objective is parameterization of the aging curve for mechanical resistance Rp0.2 of a metallic alloy, modeled by:

Rp = a·log(t) + b

where a and b are parameters to determine, and t represents aging time.

Données simulées de résistance mécanique

Données simulées pour l'étude de résistance mécanique

Solution bayésienne pour un alliage

Solution bayésienne avec intervalle de confiance à 95%

Result Interpretation
  • Dark line : Median curve estimate
  • Dark red zone : 50% credibility interval
  • Light pink zone : 95% credibility interval
  • Black points : Simulated data used for inference

2. Two alloys [january 2024]

The natural extension involves handling data from two different alloys with distinct aging behaviors.

Données pour deux alliages différents

Données expérimentales pour deux types d'alliages

Hierarchical Modeling

For this situation, we use a Bayesian hierarchical model:

Rpi = agroup[i]·log(ti) + bgroup[i] + εi

where parameters a and b are conditioned by the alloy group.

Solution pour deux alliages

Solutions conditionnées par type d'alliage

Technical Details
  • Priors : Weakly informative normal distributions
  • MCMC chains : 4 chains of 4000 iterations
  • Convergence : R̂ < 1.01 for all parameters
  • Effective samples : > 2000 per parameter

3. Composition dependence [january 2024]

The final step involves explicitly modeling parameter dependence on alloy element concentrations.

Données avec variations de composition

Données avec variations des concentrations en Si et Mn

Complete Model

We define a linear model for parameters:

a = α0 + αSi·[Si] + αMn·[Mn]
b = β0 + βSi·[Si] + βMn·[Mn]

where [Si] and [Mn] represent silicon and manganese mass concentrations.

Antagonistic Effects

  • Silicon (Si) : Strengthens mechanical resistance (αSi > 0)
  • Manganese (Mn) : Decreases mechanical resistance (αMn < 0)
Solution dépendante de la composition

Prédictions conditionnées par concentrations

Scenario Analysis
Optimal Scenario

High [Si], low [Mn]

Upper green curve

Unfavorable Scenario

Low [Si], high [Mn]

Lower yellow curve

Compensation

[Si] ≈ [Mn]

Median blue curves

Methodological Conclusion

Bayesian analysis not only estimates parameters with their uncertainties, but also enables conditional predictions for different compositions, and quantifies the causal effect of each alloy element.

This approach provides metallurgical engineers with a powerful decision-making tool for alloy formulation optimization.